ABSTRACT

The study has examined Strategic Planning and Organizational Resilience. The main objective of the study is to examine the relationship between Strategic Planning and Organizational Resilience. The specific objectives are to examine the relationship between policy implementation and organizational reliance, to examine the relationship between time management and organizational resilience, to examine the relationship between effective decision making and organizational resilience, to determine the relationship between discipline and organizational resilience. The descriptive research method was employed since the study was to ascertain strategic planning and organization resilience. Based on this, the case study approach was adopted. The study was designed to focus on some selected multinational firms in Port Harcourt metropolis Rivers State which include Agip, Shell and Indorama, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, where primary data, via questionnaires were collected. The population of the study was made to be one hundred (100). The Taro Yemen’s formula was used to determine the sample size of 80. Based on the findings of the study, summary, conclusion and recommendations were made that on budgetary allocations, the organization should seek more funds which should be directed to research instead of administration so that a lot of emphasis given to main objectives of institute so that it may be able to achieve all that it sets to achieve and v.         Performance review process should enable the actual performance  be  easily  measured  and  reviewed.  Monitoring system should be able to indicate if there are any deviations from the actual expectations so that reasons for such deviations can be investigated and appropriate measures taken to correct them.

TABLE OF CONTENT

Title Page    i

Certification         iii

Dedication  iv

Acknowledgments         v

Abstract      vi

Table of Content  vii

CHAPTER 1        1

INTRODUCTION         1

1.1 Background of The Study 1

1.2 Statement of Problems      3

1.3 Objectives of The Study    4

1.4 Research Question   4

1.5 Significance of The Study  4

1.7 Scope/Limitations of The Study 5

CHAPTER 2        7

LITERATURE REVIEW        7

2.1 Conceptual Framework     7

2.1.2 Concept of Strategy       7

2.1.3 Concept Of Strategic Planning 9

2.1.4 Dimensions of Strategic Planning      12

2.1.5 Organizational Resilience         13

2.1.6 Measures of Organizational Recilience        16

2.2 Theoritical Framework      18

2.2.1 Strategic Planning Models       18

2.2.2 Basic Strategic Planning Model         18

2.2.3 Issue – Based (or Goal – Based) Planning Model   19

2.3 Empirical Framework       20

CHAPTER 3        21

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY      21

3.1 Research Design      21

3.2 Population of The Study   22

3.3 Questionnaire Design        22

3.4 Source And Method Of Data Collection        22

3.5 Sample And Sampling Techniques       23

CHAPTER 4        25

DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS       25

4.1 Data Collection And Presentation        25

4.2 Data Analysis 26

4.3 Discussion of Findings      31

CHAPTER 5        33

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS         33

5.1 Summary       33

5.2 Conclusion     33

5.3 Recommendations   34

References  36

Appendix I 38

Appendix II          39

CHAPTER 1

                   INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

In order to assess the level of success or otherwise of a corporate body, its established strategic plans relative to the performance of the organization in all fronts of operations have to be ascertained. Formulating, implementing and the evaluation of a Strategic Plan indisputably become a major activity in  both  profit  and  not-for-profit  organizations, especially, in commercial banks.

Strategic Plan provides the basic direction and rationale for determining the focus of an organization; and also provides the specification against which any organization may best decide what to do and how to do it. Simply put, it is a process for creating and describing a better future in measurable terms and the selection of the best means to achieve the results desired. It is important to note that not all planning is actually strategic even though they may be termed so. It is said that failure to plan leads to planning to fail.

Strategic planning standardizes the processes of goal/objective setting, situation analysis, alternative consideration, implementation and evaluation that enable an organization to attain its goals and objectives (Tapinos et. al. 2005). Sarason and Tegarden, (2003) asserted to the positive correlation between strategic planning and performance achievements as very beneficial for organizations. In their studies Dyson, (2000); McAdam and Bailie, (2002) further emphasized the need for organizations to align their strategies with the organization performance measurement systems.

Organizational resiliency refers to an organization’s ability to create an environment that enhances career resiliency of their employees (Brock & Grady, 2002; Nishikawa, 2006). An organization committed to building resilient employees will foster openness in communication, encouragement of individual contributions for personal growth, risk-taking all with the promise of employee recognition and rewards (O’Leary, 1998). Resilient organizations structure and restructure themselves to attain a mission, support the optimal development of shared decision-making. They provide feedback, set goals, and have intelligence-gathering mechanisms (Nishikawa, 2006). They employ people who react quickly and efficiently to change and perceive experiences constructively, ensuring adequate external resources, expand decision-making boundaries, develop the ability to create solutions on the spot, and develop tolerance for uncertainty (R. R. Greene et al., 2002).

Clearly, these statements emphasize the importance and the need for a comprehensive, systematic and dynamic strategic planning for every bamk which seeks to survive competition in the changing global competitive in the banking environment. Ansoff (1970) argues that planning generally produces better alignment and financial results in bank which are strategically managed than those which are not. This suggests an apparent correlation between strategic planning and the ultimate performance of a company in terms of its growth, profits, attainment of objectives and sustained competitiveness (Strickland, 2004).

The need for organizations to plan and monitor their activities in order to focus resources and efforts to ensure their future survival, consultants and educational programmes. Strategic planning is now a routine part of business or organizations with an accompanying set of beliefs and protocols that underpin the day-to-day practice. As indicated in the works of Ring and Perry (1985), Bryson and Roering(1987) as well as Nutt and Backoff (1993), the conceptualization that best recognizes and appropriates all the possibilities of strategy may be termed strategic. Each of the three aspects is essential to the others: Strategic Thinking, Strategic Planning, and Strategic Action.

1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEMS

This research is motivated by the idea that unsuccessful business organization especially in multinational firms and may rise from their poor planning. It could be noted that lack of proper planning under the development and effectiveness of the organization.

There will be problem if an effective strategic planning arenot introduced into the performance to examine the method of performance and work-flow procedure. When this is not done, the maximum benefit/objective would not be gained.

There will be problem when the work place is not planned in such a way that performance is integrated with other department and system in banking industries.

Problem may arise when the staff involved in production are not trained in the various skills required.

The following are the problems identified in the study:

i.        Poor policy implementation in the organizational.

ii.       Poor time management.

iii.      Ineffective decision-making process.

iv.      Lack of discipline among organizational members.

Human resources managers need training to ensure that job design and job specifications are prepared in a suitable form and pattern.

1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The main objective of the study is to examine the relationship between strategic planning and organizational Resilience. The specific objectives are as follows:

v.       To examine the relationship between policy implementation and organizational reliance.

vi.      To examine the relationship between time management and organizational resilience.

vii.     To examine the relationship between effective decision making and organizational resilience.

viii.    To determine the relationship between discipline and organizational resilience.

1.4 RESEARCH QUESTION

i.        Does policy implementation influence organizational reliance?

ii.       To what extent does time management influence organizational resilience?

iii.      What is the extent to which effective decision-making influence organizational resilience?

iv.      Does discipline influence organizational resilience?

1.5 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

The outcome of this study will be of immense benefit to a wide range of people. First, to the government and public policy makers, this study will help them appreciate the strategic importance of strategic planning and policies that can fast-track organizational stability for business to serve, hence, promote friendly investment climate which is an impetus for increased foreign direct investment. The study will reveal to Multinational firms to promote strategic planning in the organization in other for the organization to be effective and face their competitors.

1.7 SCOPE/LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

The study is delimited under the following heading: content scope, geographical scope and unit of analysis.

1.       Content Scope: The content scope of this study involves on investigation to ascertain the relationship between strategic planning and organizational Reliance. The dependent variable is organizational Reliance, measures by Robustness, Resourcefulness, Response. While independent variable is strategic planning measure by policy implementation, time management, decision making and discipline.

2.       Geographical Scope: This study is delimited in Port Harcourt Metropolis with special reference to some selected multinational firms in Port Harcourt metropolis Rivers State which include Agip, Shell and Indorama.

3.       Unit of Analysis: The unit of analysis in this research involves the individuals at the time of carrying out the study. The scope of this study is to ascertain the relationship between strategic planning and organizational Reliance. In the next segment, Limitation of the study will be discussed.

1.8 DEFINITION OF TERMS

There is need for every work in a research proposal and of course in any research report to be clear as to its meaning, since words have different meaning in different context.

BUSINESS: The act of buying and selling of goods and rendering of services for profit maximization.

ORGANIZATION: An organized body of people with a particular purpose, especially a business, society, association, etc.

PLANNING: This is a detailed arrangement for something for something you want to do in the future.

RESILIENCE: The capacity to recover quickly from difficulties; toughness.

STRATEGY: This is a plan that is intended is to achieve a particular purpose.

The practice of making one’s living by engaging in commerce.